<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>硬盘测试 on ICE345のBLOG</title><link>https://myblog.050626.xyz/tags/%E7%A1%AC%E7%9B%98%E6%B5%8B%E8%AF%95/</link><description>Recent content in 硬盘测试 on ICE345のBLOG</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>zh-cn</language><copyright>© 2026 ICE345</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://myblog.050626.xyz/tags/%E7%A1%AC%E7%9B%98%E6%B5%8B%E8%AF%95/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How fast are your disks?</title><link>https://myblog.050626.xyz/notes/system/how-fast-are-your-disks/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://myblog.050626.xyz/notes/system/how-fast-are-your-disks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Storage benchmarking—much like &lt;a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/01/how-ars-tests-wi-fi-gear-and-you-can-too/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;Wi-Fi benchmarking&lt;/a&gt; is a widely misunderstood black art. Admins and enthusiasts have for decades been tempted to just &amp;ldquo;get the big number&amp;rdquo; by reading or writing a large amount of data to a disk, getting a figure in MB/sec, and calling it a day. Unfortunately, the actual workload of a typical disk doesn&amp;rsquo;t look like that—and that &amp;ldquo;simple speed test&amp;rdquo; doesn&amp;rsquo;t reproduce a lot of the bottlenecks that slow down disk access in real-world systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>